The Supreme Court of Pakistan has ruled that military trials for civilians are unconstitutional, which is being hailed as a victory for democracy by experts.

After Imran Khan was arrested in May, the government said more than 100 people would be tried in military courts following protests.

There was widespread criticism of the decision from human rights organizations.

The cases will now be transferred to civilian tribunals.

It may also open the door to appeals for other civilians convicted in military courts.

In a legal challenge to the military proceedings, Aitzaz Ahsan, a lawyer for Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), said, “Today’s verdict strengthens the constitution, law, and civilian institutions of the country.”

There were also other legal experts who praised the “courageous” verdict.

According to Ahsan Bhoon, former president of Pakistan’s Supreme Court Bar Association, the decision was “absolutely correct” and upheld the constitution.

The government’s decision to try Mr Khan’s supporters in military courts had raised concerns about fairness. According to Amnesty International, military tribunals have a history of coerced confessions, lack of transparency, and disregard for due process.

However, some government officials disagreed with the decision.

On X, Jan Achakzai, the caretaker information minister of Balochistan province, where the cases were filed, said while he respected the decision, it was “disappointing” and the petition was purely political.